Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 18:57:14
Message-Id: 43B976F1.6010205@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings by Peter
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Peter wrote:
5 | On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:00:17 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
6 |> Actually, portage-2.1 has seen an improvement in this area. In addition,
7 |> I have written a patch that obsoletes the metadata transfer. That's
8 |> right, no metadata transfer necessary. :)
9 |>
10 |> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/1602
11 |>
12 |> Zac
13 |
14 | Thank you. I will take a look. It sure _looks_ simple and logical enough.
15 | I don't know enough about portage though to understand! Will it work with
16 | < pre?. I have x86 portage installed, not ~x86.
17 |
18
19 No, you need a 2.1_pre release due to cache changes that my patch relies on (a backport would not really be worth the trouble IMO). Hopefully the 2.1 branch will be stable soon enough though.
20
21 Zac
22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
24
25 iD8DBQFDuXbx/ejvha5XGaMRAsVUAKCfDlOg8aloPHwgxeG2tQIYt0MnuACfe8zH
26 ApZjRceyt6uL/g64T7heGmM=
27 =KERa
28 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 --
30 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list