Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter <pete4abw@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:34:43
Message-Id: pan.2006.01.02.10.29.41.701130@comcast.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings by Zac Medico
1 On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:00:17 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
2 > Actually, portage-2.1 has seen an improvement in this area. In addition,
3 > I have written a patch that obsoletes the metadata transfer. That's
4 > right, no metadata transfer necessary. :)
5 >
6 > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/1602
7 >
8 > Zac
9
10 Thank you. I will take a look. It sure _looks_ simple and logical enough.
11 I don't know enough about portage though to understand! Will it work with
12 < pre?. I have x86 portage installed, not ~x86.
13
14 --
15 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings Zac Medico <zmedico@×××××.com>