Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 03:02:21
Message-Id: 43B89741.8000103@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings by Peter
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Peter wrote:
5 | On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:53:18 -0500, Peter wrote:
6 |> For right now, I have reiser handling /mnt/src, and I'll leave this
7 |> alone for a while. Don't know if performance will improve. It _might_
8 |> since the act of syncing will force a read through the entire portage
9 |> tree which might make metadata faster
10 |>
11 |>
12 | Things were going along great...Well, after 4 days, it's back to hanging
13 | at 50-51% again. Hope this is better in the next version of portage.
14 |
15
16 Actually, portage-2.1 has seen an improvement in this area. In addition, I have written a patch that obsoletes the metadata transfer. That's right, no metadata transfer necessary. :)
17
18 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/1602
19
20 Zac
21 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
23
24 iD8DBQFDuJdB/ejvha5XGaMRAmH8AJ9WeMgBwjSs3CTDuWWE4iElurRJigCeIRPS
25 gC89IkTzngJtTVMMv5uachk=
26 =iTs5
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 --
29 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings Peter <pete4abw@×××××××.net>