1 |
Your better off to use a VPN device to hold the connection across the 2 |
2 |
offices. If your connection is extremely crap; then you'll need to |
3 |
upgrade to a better service provider. As far as your windows vpn issue, |
4 |
the device is not hidden; you just built your vpn connection wrong. you |
5 |
need to remove the option to use the remote host as a gateway, this will |
6 |
allow you to use your local interface for dns routing, not the other |
7 |
side. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 10:40 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: |
11 |
|
12 |
> Dear List |
13 |
> |
14 |
> We are a tiny business running in China. In China ISP competition is not |
15 |
> very healthy, 2 major ISPs: China Telcom, China Netcom both defend their |
16 |
> own business by limiting network access to other ISP. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> We have an office in Beijing, in Beijing there is only one ISP company |
19 |
> (monoplay business) that is China Netcom so they "choose" to use it. |
20 |
> We have an office in Xiamen, in Xiamen there is only one ISP company |
21 |
> (monoplay business) that is China Telcom, so we "choose" to use it. |
22 |
> We also have a server hosted by a hosting company, that company is very |
23 |
> smart, using some very special technology to connect both ISP. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Transfer data from our Xiamen Office to Beijing => 3 ~ 10 KB/s, no |
26 |
> connection can maintain 10 minutes. Transfer data from Beijing to Xiamen |
27 |
> is the same slow. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> In Xiamen, transfer data from / to our server is 100KB/s; in Beijing |
30 |
> exactly the same. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> We used to use skype, but quality isn't very high nor very realiable |
33 |
> because only a few super-nodes have fast access to both ISP. Besides we |
34 |
> got a few other problems too related to skype / gizmo. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> I am thinking perhaps it's not difficult to set up some software on the |
37 |
> server that do the "routing", e.g. it serve as a call center that both |
38 |
> office login to a VOIP software and it connects to the server, the |
39 |
> server talk to both sides. This is the fastest solution and it should |
40 |
> work. That's only my imagination, I am still searching for such |
41 |
> software. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Both offices use OpenSuSE as desktop computer and the server runs Gentoo |
44 |
> Linux. Both offices are behind each one's NAT firewall. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Any suggestions on a VOIP solution for our office? |
47 |
> |
48 |
> P.S. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Certainly THIS would work: set up VPN on the server and both office dial |
51 |
> into the VPN before they start to use some SIP software. This can solve |
52 |
> the problem, but I think it's over complicated. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Besides, I never tried VPN on Linux, only did it on Windows: on windows |
55 |
> the downside is once a host has dialed up VPN, local network connection |
56 |
> is "hidden" for it, that I can no longer access the hosts in the same |
57 |
> office that has not yet dialed in the same VPN. This is not acceptable |
58 |
> for us. |
59 |
> -- |
60 |
> Zhang Weiwu |
61 |
> Real Softservice |
62 |
> http://www.realss.com |
63 |
> +86 592 2091112 |
64 |
> |