| 1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:36:45 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> >> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages |
| 6 |
>> >> should NOT be the way they are right now. |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> > Such as? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Finer control, without cluttering the world file. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> What could be finer than picking which packages you want to install. The |
| 13 |
> KDE meta packages are for people who don't want fine control. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It really depends on, from what side you're coming. If you want |
| 16 |
just a few packages, then all is well with the current approach. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If you, however, want everything but a few packages, then the |
| 19 |
current approach isn't so fine anymore. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I do understand that there's a reason why it is the way it is, |
| 22 |
but this does not mean, that I have to like it, does it? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Michael |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives