| 1 |
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:27:59 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> It really depends on, from what side you're coming. If you want |
| 4 |
> just a few packages, then all is well with the current approach. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If you, however, want everything but a few packages, then the |
| 7 |
> current approach isn't so fine anymore. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Do as previously suggested and use individual meta packages instead of |
| 10 |
the all-encompassing kde-meta, or use a mixture of meta and individual |
| 11 |
packages (that is what I do). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If you just want to omit a couple of packages, try package.provided. This |
| 14 |
is not what it is meant for, but I have used it to exclude kppp and |
| 15 |
kpersonaliser. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> I do understand that there's a reason why it is the way it is, |
| 18 |
> but this does not mean, that I have to like it, does it? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Of course not :) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Handy Guide to Modern Science: |
| 27 |
1. If it's green or it wiggles, it's biology. |
| 28 |
2. If it stinks, it's chemistry. |
| 29 |
3. If it doesn't work, it's physics. |
Archives