1 |
On Sunday 25 Aug 2013 11:35:29 meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
2 |
> Paul Colquhoun <paulcol@×××××××××××××××××.au> [13-08-25 12:04]: |
3 |
> > On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 06:04:13 meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
4 |
> > > Hi, |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > There are two RTCs in my system: |
7 |
> > > /dev/rtc0 and /dev/rtc1 |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > rtc0 is not powered by a battery and forgets time/date |
10 |
> > > with system shutdown and rtc1 is a I2C-rtc (DS3231) which |
11 |
> > > is powered by a battery. It is extremly accurate in comparison |
12 |
> > > with rtc0. |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > rtc0 is accessible with system boot - rtc1 is not (current state). |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > I know this might be obvious, but just in case: |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Have you checked to see if the dud RTC can be disabled in the BIOS? |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Or completely remove its drivers from the kernel? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Hi Paul, |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I cannot remove rtc0 since it is integrated into the CPU. I cannot |
25 |
> remove the CPU for various reasons... ;) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I put the script (see previous mail) into /etc/init.d and call it now |
28 |
> at sysinit times. This works so far...but I still have entries in /sys |
29 |
> and /proc which show 1.1.1970. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Is there any way to get rid of the need to use "echo..bla..bla" into |
32 |
> files of the sysfs but to give the kernel the needed informations |
33 |
> directly, so rtc1 is available to the kernel...? |
34 |
|
35 |
I noticed you mentioned rtc0 is not powered by a battery, but that's what the |
36 |
CMOS battery does. I'm curious why you don't add a new CMOS battery to your |
37 |
MoBo? |
38 |
-- |
39 |
Regards, |
40 |
Mick |