1 |
Jc García <jyo.garcia <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> > Often, the Arch linux documents give one a more robust background for |
5 |
> > reading up on issues/choices related to Gentoo. After all, Arch is |
6 |
> > based |
7 |
> > on Gentoo and their documents are often a good compliment for reading |
8 |
> > up on issues you face with Gentoo, |
9 |
|
10 |
OK, so you do not like the word "based", as I used it for a very loose |
11 |
meaning that the 2 distros, functionally are very similar. |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
> Arch is NOT based on gentoo, ArchLinux is it's own thing, PKGBUILDS |
15 |
> for building, and pacman as package manager, and there's systemd which |
16 |
> is used there as default, on top of that, is the /bin and /sbin merge |
17 |
> in in /usr, so arch and gentoo are different and it's own thing each. |
18 |
|
19 |
> > particularly when abstracted to |
20 |
> > a general understanding of the needs you may have. That said, do not |
21 |
> > blindly follow Arch Linux documents to resolve gentoo issues. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
Since Gentoo started approximately 3 years before Arch-linux, no doubts it |
25 |
was significantly influenced by the same topological forces that give them |
26 |
both similar and unique charactersistics. |
27 |
|
28 |
Both are rolling distros. Both can be build up from sources, although |
29 |
Arch makes the binary install path the default for its (new) users, |
30 |
as well as recovery of binaries that get deleted or become corrupted. |
31 |
|
32 |
Both have mulitiple packages installation schemes (management of installing |
33 |
softwares (portage Palaudis Overlays) and (pacman, AUR, yaourt). Both |
34 |
distros provide a myriad of macanisms to build from sources, as well as |
35 |
maintain binaries. Both systems allow bleeding edge installation from source |
36 |
repositories, as well as stable software components. So both distros are |
37 |
considered, by most, to be source derived distros. |
38 |
|
39 |
Both distros where definately influenced by the BSD ports approach to |
40 |
software installation from sources. |
41 |
|
42 |
Both distros offer Systemd. |
43 |
|
44 |
Both Gentoo and Arch installations only include a base system, both are |
45 |
considered to be highly customizable. |
46 |
|
47 |
The notable difference is Arch has some of the best documataion of any |
48 |
linux distro; Gentoo struggles to document many key components. Arch Linux |
49 |
is the 8th most popular linux distro, whilst Gentoo, despite being 3 years |
50 |
older, is number 47, if you believe what various sites say. |
51 |
|
52 |
Granted, Arch is not a direct lineage Gentoo offspring as the readily |
53 |
availibility of binary packages for Arch, is the most differing |
54 |
characteristic, imho; they are very similar when compared to the myriad of |
55 |
Linux distros. |
56 |
|
57 |
BUT, the point was that often, Arch linux offers up very well written |
58 |
documentation that is often usable by gentoo users. Gentoo-User is more |
59 |
active than the Arch user group, imho, but I cannot directly attribute that |
60 |
to the excellent documentation system that Arch has, but it would seem to be |
61 |
a plausible explaination. |
62 |
|
63 |
Funtoo docs are sometimes useful, as it is a Gentoo derivative ? |
64 |
Pentoo, Sabayon (& others) gentoo_ish distros exist but the docs are not as |
65 |
well developed as Arch? |
66 |
|
67 |
So my apologies for not being intensively accruate on the exact nature |
68 |
of the Gentoo-Arch relationship. The point was so that the original poster |
69 |
could easily and readily find a documenation source to complement what the |
70 |
Gentoo community has; not a dissection of the origins, influences |
71 |
and syntax differences between Gentoo and any other distro. |
72 |
|
73 |
I mostly based my "attitude" about the origins of Arch from several very |
74 |
bright (BSD) folks that left Gentoo for Arch. From the beginning Arch |
75 |
catered quite a bit more to the needs of the poor and the noobs and those |
76 |
with a lower threshold for (admin) pain as compared to Gentoo. YMMV. |
77 |
|
78 |
|
79 |
> But since Arch packages are very vanilla as those of Gentoo, the Arch |
80 |
> documentation is a good source, but you have to be aware of the base |
81 |
> system differences. |
82 |
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/partitioning |
83 |
|
84 |
|
85 |
sincerest apologies, "my liege", |
86 |
James |