1 |
On 22/08/2015 13:25, Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday 22 Aug 2015 09:18:05 Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Fernando Rodriguez wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Saturday, August 22, 2015 1:52:00 AM Alan Grimes wrote: |
5 |
>>>> That said, I spent the day doing diagnostics: |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> Findings: |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>> 1. There were a hell of a lot more memory errors than I had seen before. |
11 |
>>>> 2. There was a smudge on one of the dimm's contacts and some of the |
12 |
>>>> usual dust on the CPU-facing one. |
13 |
>>>> 3. The motherboard was not developed by sane engineers. In a sane world, |
14 |
>>>> there are two types of variables: measured variables and controlled |
15 |
>>>> variables. |
16 |
>>>> The RAM voltage would appear to be a controlled variable but it is also |
17 |
>>>> a measured variable. In order to achieve a close approximation of 1.5v, |
18 |
>>>> I had to set it to 1.530 volts. WTF... |
19 |
>>>> |
20 |
>>>> 4. an AMD K10 processor cannot successfully drive 8-ranks of high |
21 |
>>>> density ram at 2x800 mhz -- BUT IT WILL TRY!!! I found all dimms to be |
22 |
>>>> good either individually or in pairs, but the entire ram compliment of |
23 |
>>>> four dims cannot be run at full speed at once with the CPU/motherboard I |
24 |
>>>> have installed. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> Findings 3 & 4 sound like a faulty or underrated PSU...or a bad |
27 |
>>> motherboard. Start by unplugging everything that you don't need to boot |
28 |
>>> from a live CD and run some tests. |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> It sure does. A weak power supply will certainly cause some issues. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I also concur that the most likely cause of this problem is the PSU but first, |
33 |
> I would clean the RAM contacts. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Then try a replacement PSU if you have a spare one, or take your multimeter |
36 |
> and measure the output, checking for lower voltage values and fluctuations. |
37 |
> If you get bad measurements, then take your soldering iron out and for a few |
38 |
> pence inspect and replace any domed, or all capacitors on the secondary |
39 |
> (output) side. |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
<nitpick> |
43 |
A multimeter is not really a valid test. If say the 5V rail is dodgy, |
44 |
then the output will still be a solid 5V. What's happening is that the |
45 |
PSU regulator circuitry can't keep up so the output averages 5V (that's |
46 |
what the transformer gives out) with large amounts of high-frequency |
47 |
ripple superimposed. Your multimeter average's that out and displays ... |
48 |
5V! When things get really bad the output may dip momentarily when load |
49 |
is drawn, but by that stage the PSU has been struggling for a long time |
50 |
already. |
51 |
|
52 |
Use an oscilloscope instead, and you see immediately what condition the |
53 |
output is in. |
54 |
</nitpick> |
55 |
|
56 |
Few IT techs just happen to have an expensive oscilloscope just lying |
57 |
around, so a good recommendation is to replace the PSU anyway every 2 |
58 |
years or so - more if the thing runs hot. I consider these as wearing |
59 |
items, sorta like oil filters |
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
-- |
64 |
Alan McKinnon |
65 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |