| 1 |
On 4/1/2013, "Randy Barlow" <randy@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the |
| 5 |
>> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've |
| 6 |
>> seen Evolution recommended; is that OK? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>Thunderbird is my favorite mail client. You can do a lot with the KB. |
| 9 |
>For example, go to next read mail is just 'n' for next. CTRL-R for |
| 10 |
>reply. It's not bad to learn the shortcuts. Plus it has a lot of great |
| 11 |
>features and extensions. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'm trying to set Thunderbird up, but I'm not telling it the right |
| 14 |
values to connect to my ISP's POP server. I suppose I should have a |
| 15 |
rest and try again tomorrow. Thanks for the recommendation. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>For CLI clients, I sometimes use Mutt. It's a little bit of a pain to |
| 18 |
>configure for IMAP, but once you get it going it's pretty cool. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I may even have to resort to Mutt if I can't get anything else running. |
| 21 |
What a state to be in in 2013! (I don't imply that Mutt's not good, |
| 22 |
just that Kmail should never have been released in its present state. |
| 23 |
Doesn't anyone ever learn?) |
Archives