| 1 |
On Thursday 11 December 2014 12:18:28 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: |
| 2 |
> if [I were] in your place I'd try [running] emerge @world -uvDNta (the |
| 3 |
> most important one here is the -t for showing the dependency tree, you |
| 4 |
> could also play with --backtrack=30 to resolve possible issues with the |
| 5 |
> dependency calculation), after you removed the keyword stuff you just |
| 6 |
> added. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I thought someone would say that. The -t, I mean. Of course I did try it, |
| 9 |
but I already knew it wouldn't help because portage can't complete the |
| 10 |
dependency calculation. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> From your fist statement (required by >=kde-base/kdepimlibs-4.14:4) I |
| 13 |
> guess that you keyworded something that depends on kdepimlibs or |
| 14 |
> kdepimlibs itself in the past. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
$ cat /etc/portage/package.keywords |
| 17 |
sci-misc/boinc |
| 18 |
~sci-calculators/qalculate-units-0.9.4 |
| 19 |
sys-apps/portage |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
[...] |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> As a final straw (or first option - depending on you preferences) you |
| 24 |
> could resync the tree: maybe you've gotten an incomplete version/revbump |
| 25 |
> that already is resolved in later versions of the tree. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That did it - thanks. I see we have a new version of KDE today, and the |
| 28 |
changes to the tree had only been partly completed. I should have thought of |
| 29 |
that myself. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Now to shut KDE down and upgrade it... |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Rgds |
| 35 |
Peter. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
PS. Am I right in thinking that two verb constructs in everyday English are |
| 38 |
absent from German? I have the pluperfect tense and the subjunctive mood in |
| 39 |
mind. We also don't have a rule that every verb in a sentence must be in the |
| 40 |
same tense - in fact it's rarely so. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Just a passing observation; no offence meant. |
Archives