Archives
Archives
| From: | pk <peterk2@××××××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 | ||
| Date: | Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:33:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4F0551AC.2070608@coolmail.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 by Alan McKinnon |
||
| 1 | On 2012-01-05 01:02, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On my notebooks and test/development VMs, that's different. Those need |
| 4 | > udev. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Why does it need udev specifically? Just curious... if there's a |
| 7 | technical need for something else than /dev population (and possible |
| 8 | configuration of devices, i.e. tell the kernel what bits needs to be |
| 9 | switched)? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > On something as complex as a node manager, I do not believe there is |
| 12 | > such a thing as one-size fits all or a universal design. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Fully agree. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Best regards |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Peter K |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |