1 |
On Monday 02 May 2011 18:11:01 Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote: |
4 |
> >> Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Thanks for the heads up. :) |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > It seems then that Baselayout2/OpenRC is being rolled out to stable. |
9 |
> > I'll be unmasking and updating a couple of boxen today, taking |
10 |
> > advantage of some spare time and finishing the rest off next weekend. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Hope all goes well. |
13 |
> > -- |
14 |
> > Regards, |
15 |
> > Mick |
16 |
> |
17 |
> How will you / did you decide what versions to unmask? The news |
18 |
> message seems quite vague and I see lots of versions of things. Two |
19 |
> 2.X versions of baselayout and four versions of OpenRC. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I'd potentially start updating a stable machine today but I'd prefer |
22 |
> to only unmask what is actually going to become the stable version and |
23 |
> nothing higher. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> - Mark |
26 |
|
27 |
I've unmasked the latest available after reading the changelogs: |
28 |
|
29 |
sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.2 |
30 |
|
31 |
sys-apps/openrc-0.8.2-r1 |
32 |
|
33 |
All seems to work fine here. |
34 |
-- |
35 |
Regards, |
36 |
Mick |