1 |
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 15:55 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: |
2 |
> I'll probably need the asbestos drawers here shortly: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've burned up several hours here with a grindingly slow compile of |
5 |
> kde. It is an older machine ( a few years) but is a P4 2Ghz and 500MB |
6 |
> ram. Is there an alternative to this? I mean aside from using a |
7 |
> lighter, faster compiling, X setup. |
8 |
|
9 |
> Is there some burning important reason why we need to throw away hours |
10 |
> and hours compiling kde? Wouldn't a binary distribution of kde serve |
11 |
> as well in most ways? |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Okay, selfplugging a bit here, but thats ok, I've got a permit. Or |
16 |
wait, no I don't, so it seems that this is still unofficial and |
17 |
unsupported by others than me and then only at "best effort": |
18 |
|
19 |
http://chinstrap.alternating.net/ |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
begin .signature |
27 |
Tortured users / Laughing in pain |
28 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
29 |
end |