| 1 |
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 06:33:01 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer <grimlog@×××.de> |
| 3 |
wrote: |
| 4 |
> > If gentoo follows fedora on this mandatory initramfs trail, I'll switch |
| 5 |
> > to FreeBSD completely. My software works on way more systems than just |
| 6 |
> > "Linux". |
| 7 |
> That's of course your prerogative. And, as I said before: "Linux |
| 8 |
> strives to be much more than Unix, and that means do things |
| 9 |
> differently." If you want to do things the same way that it was done |
| 10 |
> in the last 20 years, maybe Linux is not the best of choices. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I read it before, but to be much more then Unix, Linux should be doing things |
| 13 |
better. Being different is what led to MS Windows' |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I myself think the new technologies are worth to change the way we did |
| 16 |
> things before. But that's just me. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The new technologies have great merit. But, the implementation of it isn't |
| 19 |
thought through. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> >> And maybe I shouldn't even mention it, but I don't use OpenRC. I use |
| 22 |
> >> systemd. And it works great on Gentoo. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Well. Linux only. If I wanted a monoculture, I would use MS-Windows or |
| 25 |
> > OSX. |
| 26 |
> Relax man. I mention what I use: I'm not forcing you (or anybody else) |
| 27 |
> to use it. But I repeat (because I said it before) that I care about |
| 28 |
> Linux, and Linux only. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
If you care about Linux, why do you allow it to be broken in such a |
| 31 |
fundamental way? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Joost |
Archives