| 1 |
walt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/25/2012 05:21 PM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds |
| 5 |
>> reasonable tho. |
| 6 |
> >From the chip maker's point of view, everything is about battery life |
| 7 |
> and small size these days. I wonder how many college kids are using |
| 8 |
> desktops these days. Desktops are only for us dinosaurs who are glued |
| 9 |
> to our computer chairs. (What fool would try to text from a desktop |
| 10 |
> machine while driving to school during rush hour on a busy street?) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
For a laptop, this could matter. I'm always thinking desktop tho. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>> I'm trying to picture a nm. o-o Hmmmm, maybe this is better. O-O |
| 15 |
>> Nope, still can't picture a nm. lol |
| 16 |
> Have you tried sci-calculators/units? Very useful utility. It defines |
| 17 |
> 1 nm as 1000 times the distance between a campaign promise and a damned |
| 18 |
> lie. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
LOL As Mater says on the movie Cars, 'That's funny right there'. ;-) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Dale |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
:-) :-) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives