Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Robin Atwood <robin@×××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] After KDE5 install massive depclean list
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:24:29
Message-Id: 201702161423.46460.robin@binro.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] After KDE5 install massive depclean list by Alan McKinnon
1 On Wednesday 15 February 2017, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2 > On 15/02/2017 15:14, Robin Atwood wrote:
3 > > Having finally got a stable KDE5 system I did an emerge depclean and got
4 > > 288 candidates! I am not sure which packages I need to keep and which
5 > > can go. I assume any package like kde-apps/kxxx-4.14* can go unless you
6 > > actually want it, but I am unclear about packages like
7 > > kde-apps/plasma-apps-15.12.3 which are slotted as 4 but have upgrades to
8 > > 16.08.3. Do I still need these?
9 >
10 > For the most part, no.
11 >
12 > Almost every kde4 package (libs, apps, plugins, and more) got updated
13 > for KDE% and many were pkgmv'ed around to new categories. So 288 sounds
14 > like the right ballpark from memory.
15 >
16 > I found that the kde ebuild maintainers did a really good job with this,
17 > and virtually every upgrade went smooth for me. The KDE4 apps I still
18 > have (amarok, k3b, etc) have their DEPENDs correct so depclean tends to
19 > be correct as is, including the plasma SLOTs.
20 >
21 > If your world file is in good condition I recommend you let portage
22 > clean what it wants to. In the unlikely evnt the devs missed something,
23 > you can always emerge a missing package or two back.
24
25 Thanks, Alan. I have added a few packages to world and will let emerge go
26 ahead!
27
28 Cheers
29 Robin
30
31 --
32 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
33 Robin Atwood.
34
35 "Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst,
36 Where there ain't no Ten Commandments an' a man can raise a thirst"
37 from "Mandalay" by Rudyard Kipling
38 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48 --
49 This message has been scanned for viruses and
50 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
51 believed to be clean.