1 |
Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs <at> online.de> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> would you please be so kind and avoid hijacking other threads next time. |
5 |
|
6 |
Um, you must not have read the response. |
7 |
|
8 |
I did specifically address and provide remedy if indeed having gcc |
9 |
installed on a machine is a security threat. |
10 |
|
11 |
Sure I expounded on the whole concept of security, because one |
12 |
of the most important aspect of any or all security is a measure |
13 |
of reasonableness and sufficiency. There are many instances, imho, |
14 |
that overkill for security is applied and often does not work, |
15 |
such as removing gcc from a system. A good hacker (security interloper) |
16 |
can patch a system without ever compiling anything on that system.... |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
Your opinion that I hijacked a thread is, well, your opinion, at best. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
Ignore what you do not like, or give a more singularly focused response, |
23 |
if you deem that necessary, but avoid pissing into a fan and telling |
24 |
the rest of us how cool and relevant you are. |
25 |
|
26 |
After all, you did not even respond with any relevance to what the poster |
27 |
was look for, did you ? (your just another pompous a.....).... |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
hth, |
31 |
James |