1 |
On (03/06/09 15:40) Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 18:39:56 Dale wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> >> Why not copy the config from the old kernel over and run make |
6 |
> >> oldconfig? May need to do some cleaning after genkernel tho. |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > That's the correct way :-) |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > But the OP asked if there was some magic way to get genkernel to use the same |
12 |
> > config as #SOME_OTHER_KERNEL. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Which of course makes no sense as there can be multiple versions and configs |
15 |
> > present. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > The small remaining part of me that is still mostly unaffected by the onset of |
18 |
> > senility seems to remember genkernel being able to do something expressed as: |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > zcat /proc/config.gz > /usr/src/linux/.config |
21 |
> > genkernel [....] |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > Which I suppose is a reasonable thing for an app like genkernel to do. |
24 |
> > But I could also just be imagining it. It happens :-) |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> |
29 |
> True, I did go a little off base. I did try genkernel once a long time |
30 |
> ago. It included things for hardware I didn't have then omitted the |
31 |
> driver for my IDE chipset, did include that slow as crap generic tho. |
32 |
> Anyway, to me, genkernel is a waste of time. This is Gentoo, we want |
33 |
> only what we need and not one bit more. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Dale |
36 |
> |
37 |
> :-) :-) |
38 |
> |
39 |
Hi, |
40 |
|
41 |
genkernel uses a default config-file, check |
42 |
/usr/share/genkernel/arch/x86/kernel-config. |
43 |
i've backed it up, changing it to current .config. |
44 |
Works always (haven't used it recently though). |
45 |
HTH, Rumen |