| 1 |
Yes, maybe http://packages.gentoo.org/archs/x86/stable/ is what I want. |
| 2 |
Anyway, I still think the way gentoo uses for its package's database |
| 3 |
update is different with other distro, and seems a bit slower than |
| 4 |
others, err, I only used archlinux before. |
| 5 |
And..., what I have said above will cause a war too?... |
| 6 |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:08:02AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Tuesday 17 April 2007, anhnmncb wrote: |
| 8 |
> > Hello, |
| 9 |
> > I just want to know another method to gain the latest x86 stable |
| 10 |
> > branch's update info, nothing more else, what I have heard of I |
| 11 |
> > mensioned in the first thread really wasn't the point I wanted to |
| 12 |
> > make, so... can all of you ignore of it... |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Any way, thank you all;p |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Now that we've all had an interesting discussion on the side, maybe we |
| 17 |
> *should* get back to your original question :-) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Did you get an answer/solution for it yet? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> Optimists say the glass is half full, |
| 23 |
> Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
| 24 |
> Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Alan McKinnon |
| 27 |
> alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
| 28 |
> +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives