1 |
On Tuesday 17 April 2007, anhnmncb wrote: |
2 |
> Yes, maybe http://packages.gentoo.org/archs/x86/stable/ is what I |
3 |
> want. Anyway, I still think the way gentoo uses for its package's |
4 |
> database update is different with other distro, and seems a bit |
5 |
> slower than others, err, I only used archlinux before. |
6 |
|
7 |
That's one way of doing it, but I believe it will be slower in the long |
8 |
run. You have to load the page, read it, and decide is anything of |
9 |
interest is new. If so, you then have to emerge --sync anyway, so why |
10 |
not just do it reasonably often anyway? And if you use eix and run |
11 |
eix-sync instead of emerge --sync, then you also get a nice display of |
12 |
all changes to the tree as soon as the the sync is done. |
13 |
|
14 |
It is true that portage is a bit slow. If you are brave you can try |
15 |
paludis (it's in the portage tree) as a replacement for portage - it's |
16 |
claimed to be much faster. But, once again, it's relative: a large |
17 |
update will still take many times as long to compile and install as |
18 |
what it took portage to calculate what needs updating. |
19 |
|
20 |
Or are you actually saying that the unpack/build/install cycle takes |
21 |
much longer than installing an rpm or a deb? That can't be helped, |
22 |
that's how compilation works. |
23 |
|
24 |
> And..., what I have said above will cause a war too?... |
25 |
|
26 |
Maybe, maybe not :-) |
27 |
|
28 |
alan |
29 |
|
30 |
p.s. please don't top post |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
> |
34 |
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:08:02AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
35 |
> > On Tuesday 17 April 2007, anhnmncb wrote: |
36 |
> > > Hello, |
37 |
> > > I just want to know another method to gain the latest x86 |
38 |
> > > stable branch's update info, nothing more else, what I have heard |
39 |
> > > of I mensioned in the first thread really wasn't the point I |
40 |
> > > wanted to make, so... can all of you ignore of it... |
41 |
> > > |
42 |
> > > Any way, thank you all;p |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > Now that we've all had an interesting discussion on the side, maybe |
45 |
> > we *should* get back to your original question :-) |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > Did you get an answer/solution for it yet? |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > -- |
50 |
> > Optimists say the glass is half full, |
51 |
> > Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
52 |
> > Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> > Alan McKinnon |
55 |
> > alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
56 |
> > +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
57 |
> > -- |
58 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
Optimists say the glass is half full, |
64 |
Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
65 |
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
66 |
|
67 |
Alan McKinnon |
68 |
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
69 |
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
70 |
-- |
71 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |