| 1 |
On 01/04/2011 02:50 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 03 January 2011 14:40:41 walt wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I'm wondering if you have some mixture of baselayout versions on that |
| 5 |
>> machine from previous updates. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Unlikely: this box has been ~amd64 since before it had a complete |
| 8 |
> system. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> Could your machine be trying to start something other than kdm by |
| 11 |
>> mistake? I.e., maybe you are starting kdm for the first time from |
| 12 |
>> the VT instead of re-starting it? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Also unlikely. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I tried taking xdm out of the default run-level and calling both it and |
| 17 |
> xdm-setup in /etc/conf.d/local. It started up ok then. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That experiment still makes me suspect something in /etc is wrong. I'm out |
| 20 |
of ideas except to search through /etc for files with old dates. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
>> -- just a SWAG :) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Eh? Don't know that one. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Scientific Wild-Ass Guess. |
Archives