1 |
On 17.05.2015 22:48, Nuno Magalhães wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> wrote: |
3 |
>> tl;dr ... maybe you listed some reason to stick with mdadm/lvm2/xfs etc |
4 |
>> ... sorry in that case |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I didn't. 2 disks with RAID1/LVM, 2 disks (maybe) with ZFS. Pairs |
7 |
> because by board has 2 SATA channels, otherwise i'd go RAID5 and gain |
8 |
> an extra TB. |
9 |
> BTRFS seems a bit unstable at the moment (i could be wrong). |
10 |
|
11 |
not for your use-case = RAID1 |
12 |
|
13 |
-> google for Chris Mason, btrfs, stable ... |
14 |
|
15 |
Ok, it is not as tested as XFS or ext4 ... but stable enough for |
16 |
desktops with a few disks (avoid RAID5/6 for now, yes .. but lev1 should |
17 |
be fine already). |
18 |
|
19 |
btrfs is in development still, sure (all other fs are in development as |
20 |
well ;) ). |
21 |
|
22 |
- |
23 |
|
24 |
So if you decide for it, keep your kernel and btrfs-progs updated ... |
25 |
and an eye on the btrfs-mailing-list(s). And don't overdo with the |
26 |
snapshots ( ... 10, ok ... hundreds, hmm ... ). |
27 |
|
28 |
backups ... no comment needed, right? |
29 |
|
30 |
There were problems with btrfs and the kernel a few months ago (Rich |
31 |
Freeman was hit by that, maybe he chimes in here), but in general for me |
32 |
it is still a very positive experience. |
33 |
|
34 |
I run it on 2 servers with RAID1-setups, a desktop with an SSD and a |
35 |
RAID1 for 2 hdds ... and on two laptops with dualboot-setups ... after |
36 |
the initial learning phase I am basically just using it and happy. |
37 |
|
38 |
No more re-partitioning hassle ... checksums overall ... snapshots if |
39 |
you want ... etc etc |
40 |
|
41 |
For example I cloned my working rootfs into a separate btrfs-subvolume, |
42 |
and rebuilt everything in there (using systemd-nspawn ... off-topic |
43 |
here) ... and then switched over to that rootfs by simply adding a new |
44 |
gummiboot entry. |
45 |
|
46 |
As you ordered 2 ssds right now this seems a perfect opportunity to |
47 |
start over and test something "new" (btrfs is in the linux kernel since |
48 |
2009). |
49 |
|
50 |
good luck, have fun, Stefan |