| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:59:36 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> No offense Neil, I read the sig even if I don't read your replies., lol |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> That's probably a good policy. I'll have to remember that the next time |
| 8 |
> I want to insult you, to do it in my sig :P |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Well, it depends on the subject matter. You sometimes reply on threads |
| 14 |
that I know nothing about and don't use. There's not much need in |
| 15 |
reading the whole reply but the sig is sometimes pretty neat. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I like the irony of the sig sometimes. I know a couple times your sig |
| 18 |
seemed to be foreseeing the future on a problem being discussed. Others |
| 19 |
have even mentioned it before too. Makes one wonder. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Dale |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
:-) :-) |
Archives