| 1 |
On 17.11.2009 17:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
>>> You wouldn't miss a log messsage by sending a SIGHUP to your mail |
| 3 |
>>> server, the logger would keep running. |
| 4 |
>> When syslog-ng cannot process messages for whatever reason, it will |
| 5 |
>> buffer them. When the buffer is full, it will drop the messages. There |
| 6 |
>> is no need to add to the load and increase message loss probability with |
| 7 |
>> SIGHUP (think of a central log server). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> How does sending a SIGHUP to smtpd increase the load on the syslog server? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Ugh, smtpd? Where did that come from? There was no mention of smtpd in |
| 12 |
the thread. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Hectic day at work? :) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Eray |
Archives