| 1 |
2006/3/22, hawat.thufir@×××××.com <hawat.thufir@×××××.com>: |
| 2 |
> It's masked: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> localhost ~ # emerge mozplugger |
| 5 |
> Calculating dependencies |
| 6 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "mozplugger" have been masked. |
| 7 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
| 8 |
> request: |
| 9 |
> - net-www/mozplugger-1.6.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 10 |
> - net-www/mozplugger-1.7.3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 11 |
> - net-www/mozplugger-1.7.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 12 |
> - net-www/mozplugger-1.5.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page |
| 15 |
> or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> localhost ~ # date |
| 18 |
> Wed Mar 22 14:36:00 GMT 2006 |
| 19 |
> localhost ~ # |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> but, when I went to <http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?mozplugger-1.5.2> |
| 22 |
> I notice just one bug relating to installing mozplugger. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Do other gentoo users unmask generally, go without, or substitute? I |
| 25 |
> don't think there's a substitute, but... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Hi, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
~x86 means that this package is marked as unstable because it needs |
| 30 |
some testing, if you want to test it (don't worry, I've my whole |
| 31 |
system in ~x86 and it's quite stable), just unmask it this way : |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
echo "net-www/mozplugger ~x86" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
You'll have to create /etc/portage/ if it's the first time you use the |
| 36 |
/etc/portage/* files ... |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
regards, |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Boris. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> The wiki's down at the moment :( |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> -Thufir |
| 46 |
> -- |
| 47 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-- |
| 54 |
Quiconque me parle de Dieu en veut à ma bourse ou à ma liberté. |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-- |
| 57 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives