| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:58:50 -0400 Jeff <jmg_071769@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 4 |
> Wondering, what's the difference between ctags and exuberant-ctags, |
| 5 |
> and why one would take the place of the other? One of my users has |
| 6 |
> pointed out that 'there should be only one', and that he has always |
| 7 |
> used exuberant in the past. Is there a way to safely link exuberant |
| 8 |
> for him without hosing his system? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> See here: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> # find /usr/bin/ | grep ctag |
| 13 |
> /usr/bin/exuberant-ctags |
| 14 |
> /usr/bin/ctags |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Quoting the exuberant-ctags ebuild: |
| 17 |
> namepace collision with X/Emacs-provided /usr/bin/ctags -- we |
| 18 |
> rename ctags to exuberant-ctags (Mandrake does this also). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So if you have X/Emacs installed it would explain the existance |
| 21 |
of /usr/bin/ctags on your system. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
As for your user... He can simply alias exuberant-ctags to ctags in |
| 24 |
his .bashrc and be done with it. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Cheers, |
| 28 |
Renat |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise loesen, |
| 32 |
durch die sie entstanden sind. |
| 33 |
(Einstein) |
Archives