1 |
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:46:26 -0500, reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > > Another possibility is that ypou merged them with the --oneshot |
5 |
> > > option, or that they were pulled in as a dependency of a package you |
6 |
> > > no longer have (or has been updated to a version that is no longer |
7 |
> > > dependent on them). What does "emerge --depclean -p" show? |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Along with dire warnings about ruining your system it lists 80 pkgs to |
10 |
> > be removed. Some are also on the eix-test-obsolete list of 14. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I suspect I had better not allow it to actually remove these pkgs. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I think you should, as long as nothing system-critical is listed, and |
15 |
> emerge shouts loudly about removing those. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
On a long list of packages to be cleaned I find it comforting to use |
19 |
|
20 |
emerge -C package1 package2 package3 |
21 |
|
22 |
and watch closely so that nothing system oriented gets taken out. |
23 |
|
24 |
I've made the mistake of doing |
25 |
|
26 |
emerge --depclean |
27 |
|
28 |
on a long list of files and then having a system that was hard to fix. |
29 |
|
30 |
Just my take on being careful. |
31 |
|
32 |
- Mark |
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |