Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:12:45
Message-Id: 33B5FAE6-A6E8-4BF9-80C2-3B797FE9232F@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far by "J. Roeleveld"
1 On 9 Feb 2010, at 19:37, J. Roeleveld wrote:
2 > ...
3 > Don't get me started on those ;)
4 > The reason I use Linux Software Raid is because:
5 > 1) I can't afford hardware raid adapters
6 > 2) It's generally faster then hardware fakeraid
7
8 I'd rather have slow hardware RAID than fast software RAID. I'm not
9 being a snob, it just suits my purposes better.
10
11 If speed isn't an issue then secondhand prices of SATA RAID
12 controllers (PCI & PCI-X form-factor) are starting to become really
13 cheap. Obviously new cards are all PCI-e - industry has long moved to
14 that, and enthusiasts are following.
15
16 I would be far less invested in hardware RAID if I could find regular
17 SATA controllers which boasted hot-swap. I've read reports of people
18 hot-swapping SATA drives "just fine" on their cheap controllers but
19 last time I checked there were no manufacturers who supported this as
20 a feature.
21
22 Stroller.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>