1 |
On 24 May 2008, at 18:37, Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 17:15:34 +0100 |
3 |
> Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> Hmm, on which features depends the encryption? Would a Windows Media |
6 |
>>> Player in Wine be able to play it or do I need an operating system |
7 |
>>> supporting it, maybe in a virtual machine? Has anyone tried? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Neither of these methods would work at all. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Read up on the Protected Video Path (PVP) at: |
12 |
>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do? |
13 |
>> command=printArticleBasic&articleId=9005047 |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Basically you won't be able to use a "legitimate" player under |
16 |
>> Linux. You either rip it, use a DeCSS equivalent, or not at all. |
17 |
>> ... |
18 |
> Well, then it's a no-go. The display is a pre-"HD-ready" TV-set with a |
19 |
> standard DVI-D-port and a fairly high but non-standard resolution so I |
20 |
> don't expect it to work with a hardware player or PVP. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Well, it seems like the only thing someone like me can do is to use |
23 |
> alternative ways to obtain a copy. |
24 |
|
25 |
I wouldn't rule it out completely. I should mention that not all |
26 |
disks require Protected Path at present, but more new releases may do |
27 |
in the future. But I really wouldn't expect Nero HD-DVD player (or |
28 |
whatever) to run under WINE. |
29 |
|
30 |
I believe instead that you can rip the movie files off the bluray to |
31 |
hard-drive and either play them from there or transcode them. |
32 |
|
33 |
Blurays are about 25gig, IIRC, so it's a bit much to keep your whole |
34 |
collection on your PC's desktop, but I think I read they can be |
35 |
transcoded to half their size (or is it 5gig? I can't recall) without |
36 |
quality loss. And I'd think they'd still be better-than-DVD quality |
37 |
at 2 or 3 gigs. |
38 |
|
39 |
So - 500gig harddrives coming in at under 10p per gig these days - |
40 |
it's feasible to rip 100 or 200 blurays (which'd cost you a packet at |
41 |
today's prices, anyway!) to the NAS, just until you upgrade your TV |
42 |
in 5 years time. |
43 |
|
44 |
If you Google "bluray Linux" an Ubuntu forums post comes up |
45 |
explaining the hows & whys. All the bluray's VOB files are a standard |
46 |
container/codec, so it's just the encryption you have to worry about. |
47 |
What teh haXorz are doing is running a debugger under the Windows |
48 |
players and reading the decryption keys out of memory; you download |
49 |
the list of cracked keys and put it in ~./keyz or whereever and your |
50 |
Linux ripper does the job. I think you can playback in mplayer. |
51 |
|
52 |
Finally I should mention that hi-def isn't IMO worth getting excited |
53 |
about, and I don't think it's that much better than regular old DVD. |
54 |
I happen to have a bluray player because I bought a PS3 for |
55 |
videogames and I have been tempted to buy a couple of movies for it. |
56 |
I'm sure the clarity & crispness is much clearer on releases of the |
57 |
latest movies (Transformers or whatever) but when watching classics |
58 |
like Terminator the source material (grainy film) is the limitation. |
59 |
I've got high-bitrate DVDs on which the failings of the source |
60 |
material is clearly visible, FFS! On "28 Days Later" (bluray) you can |
61 |
VERY clearly see the haze of the greenscreen behind the actor's head |
62 |
as he walks across Westminster Bridge - they filmed that scene using |
63 |
a small handycam (lower def than 1080p?), then used software to put |
64 |
the background in afterwards, and it's quite obvious that they did |
65 |
so. Any of these movies I'd enjoy just as much on regular DVD, so |
66 |
just remember that hi-def isn't necessarily better - I might spend |
67 |
the odd tenner here or there indulging myself on BluRays, but new or |
68 |
second-hand I'm only paying £3 - £5 for DVDs, and it's hard to argue |
69 |
that hi-def is 3x to 6x better. |
70 |
|
71 |
Stroller. |
72 |
|
73 |
-- |
74 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |