1 |
pk wrote: |
2 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
>> DeviceKit isn't even in portage yet and not many packages support it. I don't |
4 |
>> even know if the devs will change and improve the configs much, if at all. The |
5 |
>> problem with hal is that it's code base is a mess, and it's design is a mish- |
6 |
>> mash of stuff throwwn together. At least, that's what the lead hal dev says |
7 |
> |
8 |
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DeviceKit#Dependencies |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I haven't looked into this in any depth but it seems like Devicekit will |
11 |
> not be an improvement (looks like it brings in the "kitchen sink" in |
12 |
> dependencies - I'm also "allergic" to gnome)... |
13 |
|
14 |
I don't see how it depends on Gnome. In any case, it's not obvious to |
15 |
me from either the link you posted nor from DeviceKit's homepage. |