1 |
Am Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 06:37:52AM -0600 schrieb Dale: |
2 |
> Howdy, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've pretty much reached a limit on my backups. I'm up to a 16TB hard |
5 |
> drive for one and even that won't last long. Larger drives are much |
6 |
> more costly. A must have NAS is quickly approaching. |
7 |
|
8 |
Hear hear, ye olde story. ;-) |
9 |
|
10 |
> Path one, buy a NAS, possibly used, that has no drives. If possible, I |
11 |
> may even replace the OS that comes on it or upgrade if I can. |
12 |
|
13 |
Difficult in consumer-grade stuff, but there are ways, like for Synology: |
14 |
NetBSD on old Synology hardware: |
15 |
https://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/sandpoint/instsynology/ |
16 |
And another alternative OS for Synology: https://xpenology.com/forum/ |
17 |
|
18 |
However, even though Synology’s current trend of development is a little |
19 |
concerning with vendor lock-in and hardware restrictions in their newest |
20 |
devices, why not use the built-in software? It still is very good and easy |
21 |
to use and offers all you need like HTTP/HTTPS, FTP, CIFS, SSH, Dav etc. It |
22 |
uses btrfs or ext4 internally. |
23 |
|
24 |
Disclaimer: I have no first-hand experience with any of those devices, my |
25 |
knowledge comes from news about new devices and stuff that I read in a PC |
26 |
tech forum. Qnap’s software quality does not compete with Synology, and they |
27 |
also have a worse security track record. So don’t hook it up to the Internet |
28 |
directly. |
29 |
|
30 |
> I'm not looking for fancy, or even RAID. Just looking for a two bay NAS |
31 |
> that will work. |
32 |
|
33 |
Why just two? Sooner or later, it will become cramped again. Go for four |
34 |
bays and leave them empty for the time being. |
35 |
|
36 |
> First, what is a DAS? Is that totally different than a NAS? From what |
37 |
> I've found, a DAS is not what I'm looking for since I want a ethernet |
38 |
> connection and the ability to control things over the network. |
39 |
|
40 |
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-attached_storage, you are |
41 |
right: no ethernet, but direct connection to the host. A beefed-up external |
42 |
drive enclosure, if you will (from the little understanding I got from the |
43 |
article). |
44 |
|
45 |
> It seems DAS lacks that feature but not real sure. I'm not sure I can |
46 |
> upgrade the software/OS on a DAS either. |
47 |
|
48 |
There is no software, it is just a drive bay and the host that you hook it |
49 |
up to does all the logic work. |
50 |
|
51 |
> Next thing. Let's say a NAS comes with two 4TB drives for a total of |
52 |
> 8TB of capacity from the factory, using LVM or similar software I |
53 |
> assume. |
54 |
|
55 |
AFAIK, consumer NASes don’t use LVM. Probably only standard Raid-1/5/6/10, |
56 |
JBOD or single disk access. |
57 |
|
58 |
> Is that limited to that capacity or can I for example replace one or both |
59 |
> drives with for example 14TB drives for a total of 28TBs of capacity? |
60 |
|
61 |
Sure, why not? But then I’d buy one without any drives from the start and |
62 |
install the drives later myself. I wouldn’t know what to do with those small |
63 |
drives if I replaced them with something larger right away. |
64 |
|
65 |
> If one does that, let's say it uses LVM, can I somehow move data as well |
66 |
> or is that beyond the abilities of a NAS? |
67 |
|
68 |
What do you mean by move? AFAIK, Synology offers SSH access, but I have no |
69 |
idea what you can do with it in terms of plumbing. And why would you? It is |
70 |
supposed to do everything under the hood. But as I said, I don’t expect any |
71 |
of those to use LVM in the first place. |
72 |
|
73 |
> Could it be done inside my computer for example? |
74 |
|
75 |
With a DAS, you could. ;-) But if push comes to shove, pull out the drives |
76 |
and hook them up to your “puter”. |
77 |
|
78 |
|
79 |
> Path two, I've researched building a NAS using a Raspberry Pi 4 8GB as |
80 |
> another option. They come as parts, cases too, but the newer and faster |
81 |
> models of Raspberry Pi 4 with more ram seem to work pretty well. |
82 |
|
83 |
Just today, in a forum thread about a new Synology with underwhelming |
84 |
hardware features, people were posting alternatives. One of them was |
85 |
https://kubesail.com/homepage. Currently it’s only a small case with |
86 |
2×2.5″. But they also announced a soon-to-come 5×3.5″. |
87 |
|
88 |
> The old slower models with small amounts of ram don't fair as well. While |
89 |
> I want a descent speed, I'm not looking for or expecting it to be |
90 |
> blazingly fast. |
91 |
|
92 |
Only the very old devices with puny ARM chips were so slow they couldn’t |
93 |
saturate Gbit ethernet—with and without encryption. Synologies of recent |
94 |
years with a Celeron J4000 will have no problem. Current models with AMD |
95 |
Ryzen R1600 won’t either, but draw much more power in idle and have no |
96 |
graphics unit. OTOH, they gain ECC memory support. |
97 |
|
98 |
> I just wonder, if from a upgrade and expansion point of view, if building |
99 |
> a NAS would be better. |
100 |
|
101 |
Regardless of whether DIY or OOTB, a NAS is much more practical than a |
102 |
collection of external single enclosures. Given the rate of your growth and |
103 |
need of space, I do recommend some kind of RAID for resilience against hard |
104 |
disk failure. Does LVM offer this at all? TrueNAS runs from a USB stick and |
105 |
uses ZFS under the hood. |
106 |
|
107 |
> I've also noticed, it seems all Raspberry things come with a display port. |
108 |
|
109 |
My Pi 3B has HDMI – and HDMI only. |
110 |
|
111 |
> That means I could hook up a monitor and mouse/keyboard when needed. That |
112 |
> could be a bonus. Heck, I may can even put some sort of Gentoo on that |
113 |
> thing. :-D |
114 |
|
115 |
You could, but this is either a sink-hole for time, or you need to get up to |
116 |
speed with cross-compiling and binhosts. I went with the standard Debian and |
117 |
evaluate Arch from time to time. But I do run Gentoo on my DIY NAS with an |
118 |
i3-2000. Gentoo has ZFS in portage without overlays, which–for me–is one of |
119 |
its biggest appeals. |
120 |
|
121 |
> One reason I'm wanting to go this route, I'm trying to keep it small and |
122 |
> able to fit inside my fire safe. |
123 |
|
124 |
How small is small? Given your needs, two bays seem very constrained. And if |
125 |
four bays don’t fit, consider a dedicated safe – if it is worth the expense. |
126 |
|
127 |
> I plan to buy a media type safe that is larger but right now, it needs to |
128 |
> fit inside my current safe. |
129 |
|
130 |
OK. But then it is pointless IMHO to buy a two-bay device now and a four-bay |
131 |
later. You spend more money, you need to migrate and it is not ecological. |
132 |
|
133 |
> One thing I'd like to have no matter what path I go down, the ability to |
134 |
> encrypt the data. My current backup drives are encrypted and I'd like |
135 |
> to keep it that way. If that is possible to do. |
136 |
|
137 |
Not sure about that with Synology (it’s probably a small Internet search |
138 |
away). ZFS has encryption built-in these days. Btrfs does not, it is only |
139 |
planned, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs. You could use an |
140 |
encryption layer on your host, so the NAS only receives encrypted data, but |
141 |
that sounds cumbersome. |
142 |
|
143 |
> I suspect the Raspberry option would since I'd control the OS/software |
144 |
> placed on it. I could be wrong tho. |
145 |
|
146 |
Your OS, your features. ;-) I also encrypt my NAS. My main “threat” scenario |
147 |
is having to send in a drive. That’s why I did not set up any barrier for |
148 |
decryption: the keyfile just sits on the root partition on the system SSD. I |
149 |
was thinking about having the keyfile on a remote device like my pi, though. |
150 |
|
151 |
> One last thing. Are there any NAS type boxes that I should absolutely |
152 |
> avoid if I go that route? |
153 |
|
154 |
As I mentioned, QNAP struggles a little with security. But as long as you |
155 |
don’t hook it up to the Internet, that shouldn’t be a problem. On the plus |
156 |
side, they are a little cheaper. But I don’t have any concrete advice to |
157 |
that question. |
158 |
|
159 |
> I think the DAS thing may be one for me to avoid but I'm not for sure what |
160 |
> limits it has. |
161 |
|
162 |
Well, it has no network, because it has no computer inside. Advantages: one |
163 |
less system to maintain. Disadvantage: no distributed access, you basically |
164 |
put the share features onto the host to which you attach the DAS. This also |
165 |
includes any file system magic like your beloved LVM. |
166 |
|
167 |
> Thoughts? Info to share? Ideas on a best path forward? Buy already |
168 |
> built or build? |
169 |
|
170 |
Well, I gave you a piece of my mind. I like tinkering with storage. I am |
171 |
also still deliberating how to increase my storage. I am at 80 % of my NAS, |
172 |
which runs 4×6 TB in a RaidZ2 (meaning 2 of the 4 disks—50 % of gross |
173 |
capacity—is for redundancy). I could: |
174 |
|
175 |
- Reduce use of space by re-encoding my 3 TB of DVD copys. I wanted to do |
176 |
that anyways and it could recover more than 2 TB. |
177 |
- Install bigger drives. Maybe start out with 2×14 TB and migrate |
178 |
everything. This will lower power consumption, but leaves me with four |
179 |
6-year-old, but still perfectly working NAS drives. |
180 |
- go to RaidZ1, losing redundancy but gaining 50 % space. |
181 |
- Buy a case with more slots and buy more disks, like the new Jonsbo N1 |
182 |
(which I also found in the thread I mentioned above) with five slots: |
183 |
https://www.jonsbo.com/en/products/N1.html |
184 |
Or the Fractal Node 304 with six bays: |
185 |
https://www.fractal-design.com/products/cases/node/node-304/black/ |
186 |
But both cases require me to buy a new PSU. My current case |
187 |
(https://www.inter-tech.de/productdetails/SC-4100_EN.html) uses a tiny TFX |
188 |
one, and that one was very expensive (Gold rated). |
189 |
|
190 |
My board has “only” six SATA ports. I want to avoid installing a PCIe |
191 |
card, because that will increase power draw. But since it is a server |
192 |
board, it has an on-board USB type A, which would allow me to go to |
193 |
TrueNAS and use all six SATAs for disks. |
194 |
|
195 |
-- |
196 |
Grüße | Greetings | Salut | Qapla’ |
197 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
198 |
|
199 |
There are things of which I do not even talk to myself. |