1 |
On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, July 3, 2009 20:30, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
> > Well, AMD uses a fixed cycle - one release a month. They also have a |
4 |
> > fixed development cycle that takes roughly 3 month (all explained on |
5 |
> > phoronix a long time ago). So supporting the latest kernels is not easy |
6 |
> > or even possible. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Very well for them, I don't know how that is relevant, since 2.6.29 was |
9 |
> released 23-Mar-2009 23:30. So, by now, both the 1 month and the 3 month |
10 |
> cycles have passed. Still no support. Or maybe my maths are not correct. |
11 |
|
12 |
no, and that is why a lot of people were pissed off that .29 wasn't supported |
13 |
either. |
14 |
|
15 |
> |
16 |
> > They also only support a few distros. If you insist on using a |
17 |
> > non-supported kernel, you are on your own. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Crap. All the distros use the same kernel. If it compiles against a vanilla |
20 |
> kernel , it will compile against a vanilla kernel on *every* distro under |
21 |
> the sun. |
22 |
|
23 |
incorrect. |
24 |
|
25 |
> > That said - Nvidia might be 'better' when it comes to binary drivers, but |
26 |
> > they suck when it comes to open source drivers. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Agreed. But at least, you have *one* driver that works. With my hd2600, |
29 |
> fglrx sucks big time, and neither radeon nor radeonhd works (unless I |
30 |
> disable dri, and then vesa performs better). |
31 |
|
32 |
*shrug* my hd3870 works well enough. |
33 |
|
34 |
> |
35 |
> If I have to choose between one closed driver that works perfectly and |
36 |
> one close driver that works bad+2 open ones that simply don't work, I |
37 |
> choose the closed driver that works. |
38 |
|
39 |
go to nvnews - and you'll see that there are more than enough people where the |
40 |
driver does not work. So with amd you have 3 drivers to choose from - with |
41 |
nvidia 1. |
42 |
And please - the open ones aren't that bad. When did you try them the last |
43 |
time? |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
> |
47 |
> > AMD is working on free |
48 |
> > drivers for all cards - that is something you have to recognize. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> As far as I know (I might be wrong) amd isn't working in anything. They |
51 |
> just released the specifications and some technical sheets. The community |
52 |
> is doing all the work. |
53 |
|
54 |
very wrong. |
55 |
|
56 |
> |
57 |
> > Besides - if you use the ebuild, even 2.6.30 works. Yes, dmesg is spammed |
58 |
> > with ugly messages. But who cares? Do you really monitor dmesg non stop? |
59 |
> |
60 |
> Who cares?!? mmmm, my /var partition gets filled with +1gb logs everyday, |
61 |
|
62 |
hm - really? maybe you have stupid logging settings? because /var/log is 286M |
63 |
here - and I never remove any log ... |
64 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
> the sys logger because while the files are open the space won't be freed. |
67 |
> The driver does that, and the rest of my programs fail. But, who cares... |
68 |
> The cpu usage is insane when using fglrx on .30, 60-100% on X when I play |
69 |
> something in mplayer, so while watching a movie I can't do anything else, |
70 |
> with the same fglrx version on linux 2.6.28 it takes around 10%. |
71 |
|
72 |
root 3913 1.7 3.8 347992 195588 tty7 Ss+ Jul03 11:08 /usr/bin/X - |
73 |
br -novtswitch -qu |
74 |
|
75 |
1000 24706 5.4 0.3 174936 15288 pts/1 S+ 03:15 0:00 mplayer |
76 |
/mnt/filme/YuGiOh! The |
77 |
|
78 |
|
79 |
I suspect your system has other problems then the driver. |
80 |
|
81 |
Like a bad setup. |
82 |
|
83 |
> |
84 |
> Who cares? I do. The driver just doesn't work, these are not minor |
85 |
> annoyances, as you paint them, these are big problems. And the ebuild |
86 |
> should be eliminated, and the old one depending on <2.6.29 should be |
87 |
> restored. |
88 |
> |
89 |
> I really advice to stay in .28 if you are going to use fglrx. |
90 |
|
91 |
and people who want to use an actual kernel punished just because YOU are too |
92 |
lazy to use package.mask? |
93 |
|
94 |
I really advice you to rethink your position before you make anti-social |
95 |
demands. |