1 |
On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:17, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> If I have to choose between one closed driver that works perfectly and |
5 |
>> one close driver that works bad+2 open ones that simply don't work, I |
6 |
>> choose the closed driver that works. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> go to nvnews - and you'll see that there are more than enough people |
9 |
> where the driver does not work. So with amd you have 3 drivers to choose |
10 |
> from - with nvidia 1. |
11 |
|
12 |
Fair enough :) |
13 |
|
14 |
> And please - the open ones aren't that bad. When did |
15 |
> you try them the last time? |
16 |
|
17 |
Some days ago. During months for now. |
18 |
|
19 |
I've tried every single version of the drivers, mesa, Xorg and whatever |
20 |
you can think of. From older to newer to live. |
21 |
|
22 |
They simply don't work with my card. I don't want to taint the thread so |
23 |
I will just say that one of the latest thread about that is this: |
24 |
|
25 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-5789462.html |
26 |
|
27 |
>>> Besides - if you use the ebuild, even 2.6.30 works. Yes, dmesg is |
28 |
>>> spammed with ugly messages. But who cares? Do you really monitor dmesg |
29 |
>>> non stop? |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> Who cares?!? mmmm, my /var partition gets filled with +1gb logs |
32 |
>> everyday, |
33 |
> |
34 |
> hm - really? maybe you have stupid logging settings? because /var/log is |
35 |
> 286M |
36 |
> here - and I never remove any log ... |
37 |
|
38 |
No. I haven't. My logs have always been perfectly sane until I've used |
39 |
fglrx with .30. Besides the fact that the logs don't reach the disk if |
40 |
you filter them don't fix anything about the real problem. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
>> the sys logger because while the files are open the space won't be |
44 |
>> freed. The driver does that, and the rest of my programs fail. But, who |
45 |
>> cares... The cpu usage is insane when using fglrx on .30, 60-100% on X |
46 |
>> when I play something in mplayer, so while watching a movie I can't do |
47 |
>> anything else, with the same fglrx version on linux 2.6.28 it takes |
48 |
>> around 10%. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> root 3913 1.7 3.8 347992 195588 tty7 Ss+ Jul03 11:08 |
51 |
> /usr/bin/X - |
52 |
> br -novtswitch -qu |
53 |
> |
54 |
> 1000 24706 5.4 0.3 174936 15288 pts/1 S+ 03:15 0:00 mplayer |
55 |
> /mnt/filme/YuGiOh! The |
56 |
> |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |
59 |
> I suspect your system has other problems then the driver. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> |
62 |
> Like a bad setup. |
63 |
> |
64 |
|
65 |
You are of course free to think that. I'm not going into that line |
66 |
of discussion though. My system works perfectly ok without that fatal |
67 |
combo, always did ;) |
68 |
|
69 |
>> Who cares? I do. The driver just doesn't work, these are not minor |
70 |
>> annoyances, as you paint them, these are big problems. And the ebuild |
71 |
>> should be eliminated, and the old one depending on <2.6.29 should be |
72 |
>> restored. |
73 |
>> |
74 |
>> I really advice to stay in .28 if you are going to use fglrx. |
75 |
>> |
76 |
> |
77 |
> and people who want to use an actual kernel punished just because YOU are |
78 |
> too lazy to use package.mask? |
79 |
|
80 |
And people who find these problems punished because a buggy driver has been |
81 |
forced into your system by emerge. Sir, the problem with logs is not mine, |
82 |
I've seen other persons having it. The amount of spam just depends on the |
83 |
use you do of the graphics card. If you use 3d intensive apps you will see |
84 |
how the spam grows, exponentially. At least for me it's that way. |
85 |
|
86 |
Maybe you should relax instead presupposing that all the bad things about |
87 |
fglrx+.30 are my fault. Just because it works for you it doesn't mean that |
88 |
.30+fglrx is a stable combo. Or... maybe everyone having problems is just |
89 |
idiot. |
90 |
|
91 |
> I really advice you to rethink your position before you make anti-social |
92 |
> demands. |
93 |
|
94 |
Thanks for your concern. |
95 |
|
96 |
-- |
97 |
Jesús Guerrero |