Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Greylisting vs. reject_rbl_client
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:46:30
Message-Id: 44EE475F.8000808@badapple.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Greylisting vs. reject_rbl_client by Grant
1 Grant wrote:
2 > Do you think this postfix anti-spam configuration is OK:
3 >
4 > smtpd_delay_reject = yes
5 > smtpd_helo_required = yes
6 > smtpd_helo_restrictions =
7 > permit_mynetworks,
8 > reject_non_fqdn_hostname,
9 > reject_invalid_hostname,
10 > permit
11
12 I'd be careful with non_fqdn_hostname
13
14 > smtpd_sender_restrictions =
15 > permit_mynetworks,
16 > reject_non_fqdn_sender,
17 > reject_unknown_sender_domain,
18 > permit
19 > smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
20 > permit_mynetworks,
21 > reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
22 > reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
23 > reject_unauth_destination,
24 > permit
25
26 That's pretty much what I run and you might want to look at
27 smtpd_data_restrictions as well.
28
29 > Would it be OK to remove the following aliases since I never use them:
30
31 It's good form to keep them on your server and compile with the relvent
32 RFC which specifies these.
33
34 kashani
35 --
36 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Greylisting vs. reject_rbl_client Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] Greylisting vs. reject_rbl_client Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>