| 1 |
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:43:12 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > No matter how many drives you have, I doubt you'll need more than one |
| 4 |
> > volume group. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> ...although I did find not long ago that a second VG for another, |
| 7 |
> temporary distro kept things tidy.. This is not to contradict you |
| 8 |
> though. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Oh yes, and I have two VGs on my desktop, because I want to keep backups |
| 11 |
completely separate. But for the usage Dale has mentioned, one VG is |
| 12 |
best. If for no other reason that multiple VGs reduce the flexibility of |
| 13 |
LVM. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million |
| 20 |
typewriters will eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. |
| 21 |
Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true. |
Archives