| 1 |
On 10 September 2013 10:13, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 09 Sep 2013 09:44:01 Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has |
| 4 |
>> been stabilized (at least on amd64)... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> --->8 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> Now to wait a few days to see if there is any breakage to report (not |
| 9 |
>> worried about it really, though, since it has actually gotten a ton of |
| 10 |
>> testing over the last year or two)... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> ...and the first time I use it it falls over! Portage was the only thing |
| 13 |
> updated yesterday, so nothing else changed at the same time. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> # emerge --sync |
| 16 |
>>>> Synchronization of repository 'gentoo' located in '/usr/portage'... |
| 17 |
>>>> Starting rsync with rsync://192.168.2.2/gentoo-portage... |
| 18 |
>>>> Checking server timestamp ... |
| 19 |
> receiving incremental file list |
| 20 |
> rsync: mkstemp "/var/tmp/.tmp8KJSYc.AHSsPH" failed: Permission denied (13) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Maybe this |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/477682 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 29 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives