Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:14:12
Message-Id: 2094799.2IPDqlmdT9@wstn
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? by Tanstaafl
1 On Monday 09 Sep 2013 09:44:01 Tanstaafl wrote:
2 > Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has
3 > been stabilized (at least on amd64)...
4
5 --->8
6
7 > Now to wait a few days to see if there is any breakage to report (not
8 > worried about it really, though, since it has actually gotten a ton of
9 > testing over the last year or two)...
10
11 ...and the first time I use it it falls over! Portage was the only thing
12 updated yesterday, so nothing else changed at the same time.
13
14 # emerge --sync
15 >>> Synchronization of repository 'gentoo' located in '/usr/portage'...
16 >>> Starting rsync with rsync://192.168.2.2/gentoo-portage...
17 >>> Checking server timestamp ...
18 receiving incremental file list
19 rsync: mkstemp "/var/tmp/.tmp8KJSYc.AHSsPH" failed: Permission denied (13)
20
21 I checked it wasn't anything I'd set in make.conf by stripping out everything
22 but the original few lines from system installation, so I'm sure I hadn't set
23 any odd paths.
24
25 So for the moment I've masked out =sys-apps/portage-2.2.1 and reverted to
26 2.1.12.2. Now I'm getting some odd USE flag conflicts, which I suppose won't be
27 related; I'll work on sorting that out.
28
29 I also tried syncing a 32-bit chroot Gentoo system and that worked fine. That
30 system has always had:
31
32 # grep portage /etc/portage/package.keywords
33 <sys-apps/portage-9999 **
34
35 Trust someone to find a problem! :-(
36
37 Is it working for you, Dale? :-)
38
39 --
40 Regards,
41 Peter

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>