1 |
On Monday 09 Sep 2013 09:44:01 Tanstaafl wrote: |
2 |
> Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has |
3 |
> been stabilized (at least on amd64)... |
4 |
|
5 |
--->8 |
6 |
|
7 |
> Now to wait a few days to see if there is any breakage to report (not |
8 |
> worried about it really, though, since it has actually gotten a ton of |
9 |
> testing over the last year or two)... |
10 |
|
11 |
...and the first time I use it it falls over! Portage was the only thing |
12 |
updated yesterday, so nothing else changed at the same time. |
13 |
|
14 |
# emerge --sync |
15 |
>>> Synchronization of repository 'gentoo' located in '/usr/portage'... |
16 |
>>> Starting rsync with rsync://192.168.2.2/gentoo-portage... |
17 |
>>> Checking server timestamp ... |
18 |
receiving incremental file list |
19 |
rsync: mkstemp "/var/tmp/.tmp8KJSYc.AHSsPH" failed: Permission denied (13) |
20 |
|
21 |
I checked it wasn't anything I'd set in make.conf by stripping out everything |
22 |
but the original few lines from system installation, so I'm sure I hadn't set |
23 |
any odd paths. |
24 |
|
25 |
So for the moment I've masked out =sys-apps/portage-2.2.1 and reverted to |
26 |
2.1.12.2. Now I'm getting some odd USE flag conflicts, which I suppose won't be |
27 |
related; I'll work on sorting that out. |
28 |
|
29 |
I also tried syncing a 32-bit chroot Gentoo system and that worked fine. That |
30 |
system has always had: |
31 |
|
32 |
# grep portage /etc/portage/package.keywords |
33 |
<sys-apps/portage-9999 ** |
34 |
|
35 |
Trust someone to find a problem! :-( |
36 |
|
37 |
Is it working for you, Dale? :-) |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Regards, |
41 |
Peter |