Archives
Archives
| From: | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:18:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 522F0E03.1070402@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? by Peter Humphrey |
||
| 1 | Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 | > Is it working for you, Dale? :-) |
| 3 | |
| 4 | [IP-] [ ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.1:0 |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Sun Aug 25 05:27:12 2013 >>> sys-apps/portage-2.2.1 |
| 7 | |
| 8 | So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the 9999 version, |
| 9 | for quite a while. Are you saying something is broke and it works for |
| 10 | me?? O_O Seriously?? This is a joke right?? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Dale |
| 13 | |
| 14 | :-) :-) |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> |