1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 01:31:27 Harry Putnam wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> My profile has been |
5 |
>> ../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0 |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> starting an update system today I'm told my profile is depricated and |
8 |
>> to update to default/linux/x86/10.0 |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> I've forgotten about how this is done. Is it just a matter of |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> ln -sf |
13 |
>> /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/10.0 /etc/make.profile ? |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> yes |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
>> Or does it involve something like a major regrind of every package? |
21 |
>> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> no |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
>> A quick google with site:gentoo.org "change profile" shows dozens of |
28 |
>> hits in forum messages, but I didn't notice a HOWTO or concise |
29 |
>> walk-thru. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> It's in the gentoo docs - remember that long thing you read when you installed |
33 |
> gentoo the first time, and probably haven't read again? yes, that one :-) |
34 |
> |
35 |
> All a profile does is specify some default standard packages for system, |
36 |
> default USE flags and some other various bits and pieces. Once you have set |
37 |
> your make.conf up the way you want, very little in the way of profile changes |
38 |
> affect you. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> If you find forum posts that go on about large re-emerges of world and other |
41 |
> nonsense, well you should understand that such comments represent the average |
42 |
> level of cluelessness of your average forum user and you should treat it as |
43 |
> such |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
|
49 |
Yep, I synced the tree, did the profile change and I think I had like |
50 |
two upgrades. I'm pretty sure I would have had those even if I hadn't |
51 |
changed the profile. |
52 |
|
53 |
It is possible to have a lot of packages with changes but not to |
54 |
likely. I subscribe to -dev so I can see most of the screw-ups that are |
55 |
headed my way. Let's not get started on that hal and xorg-server thing |
56 |
again tho. That one surprised me for sure. |
57 |
|
58 |
Dale |
59 |
|
60 |
:-) :-) |