| 1 |
On 6/14/06, Jesse Hannah <jesse.hannah@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> 1. Has anyone noticed if programs compiled with the latest gcc (4.1.1, I |
| 3 |
> believe) are any faster than those compiled with 3.4.6-r1? Also, is there any |
| 4 |
> difference in the required time to compile? Any other issues I should know |
| 5 |
> about with upgrading from 3.4.6-r1 to 4.1.1? (I use a pre-Prescott P4 |
| 6 |
> 3000MHz, so it'd be nice if anyone had information for that or a comparable |
| 7 |
> architecture.) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I didn't notice any speed change after recompiling. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> 2. If I want to upgrade and rebuild my entire system (using a new gcc), is: |
| 13 |
> emerge -u gcc |
| 14 |
> emerge -e world |
| 15 |
> the right thing to do? Am I missing anything there? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml |
| 18 |
Has everything you need to know... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> (Note: if it makes any difference, I have ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" set in |
| 22 |
> my /etc/make.conf. Any problems this could cause?) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
So do I. So far, so good... Except that I use binary openoffice. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Daniel da Veiga |
| 28 |
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
| 30 |
Version: 3.1 |
| 31 |
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- |
| 32 |
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ |
| 33 |
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives