1 |
W.Kenworthy wrote: |
2 |
> ... |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I have not dived in the Linux developers x Hans Reiser battle, so I |
5 |
>> don't know which side is right and which side is guilty, but think |
6 |
>> that either |
7 |
>> A) reiserfs is a good filesystem, but the battle between Hans Reiser |
8 |
>> and Linux developers caused people to dislike reiserfs for |
9 |
>> non-technical reasons. |
10 |
>> or |
11 |
>> B) reiserfs is a bad filesystem but for some reason a lot of reiserfs |
12 |
>> fans appeared in this thread |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> A is the answer. Hans Reiser is by all accounts a brilliant, eccentric |
16 |
> but deeply flawed individual. He did not get on at a personal or |
17 |
> professional level with the world in general. It almost seems like |
18 |
> ext3/4 were developed to spite him and give alternatives so they would |
19 |
> not have to deal with him. Unprofessional words and actions were taken |
20 |
> on both sides, but the animosity caused by Hans (and others in response) |
21 |
> means that this will take forever to blow over, even with Hans out of |
22 |
> the picture. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> There is a huge amount out there on this. There are also may other |
25 |
> highly valued developers out there who may also be a little eccentric |
26 |
> (to be kind!). |
27 |
> |
28 |
> In the meantime, my opinion is that reiserfs3 is great, ext3 not quite |
29 |
> so good, and ext2/4 and reiserfs4 are for those who live on the edge :) |
30 |
> |
31 |
> BillK |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
I'm not expecting a answer but along the lines of a viewpoint in a |
37 |
question form. Why is it that smart, I mean seriously smart, people |
38 |
have the worst social skills? They can invent a super fast CPU, memory |
39 |
chip, hard drive some new chemical, or some other ingenious thing but |
40 |
can't say a kind word if you give them a double dose of Prozac. |
41 |
|
42 |
Sort of strange huh? |
43 |
|
44 |
Dale |
45 |
|
46 |
:-) :-) |