| 1 |
On 2014-02-20 7:08 PM, Daniel Campbell <lists@××××××××.us> wrote: |
| 2 |
> By striking the weakest part of the stack (sysv probably*did* |
| 3 |
> need a good replacement, but not one as ambitious as systemd) and |
| 4 |
> digging down into the kernel level (kdbus), Red Hat devs will now have a |
| 5 |
> very influential role in the FOSS world. This will in turn generate |
| 6 |
> interest (and thus profit) in Red Hat. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I sure wish someone who has Linus' ear would ask him to post a blog (or |
| 9 |
even lkml post) dissecting this entire systemd question. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Or, if anyone on here is a member of the lkml and is brave enough, post |
| 12 |
a question there asking for opinions from Linus and any other kernel dev |
| 13 |
who wishes to rant about it... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
As it stands now, for me, I don't see a real problem anymore... |
Archives