1 |
> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> You are a C man. |
4 |
> Working with bash must be .... excruciatingly painful |
5 |
|
6 |
Ah yes, State machine design; not much fittering around with |
7 |
escaping silly little symbols..... |
8 |
|
9 |
sh/csh/bash/scripting is not bad. I just 'lift' the tough stuff |
10 |
from others mostly. With some codes, like Java, you read |
11 |
and follow 90%, then there is another code to find and read. |
12 |
It never ends, on and on and on.... Then instead of one choice |
13 |
you have 3 or 4 choices....... Maven is a whole nutter beast.... |
14 |
Why it is becoming so important is still a wee bit confusing to me. |
15 |
[1] http://maven.apache.org/ |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
I'm just not use to that sort of world. In embedded, you |
19 |
over design before you begin coding. You do not have megabytes |
20 |
of lib stuff to find and read and test the dozens of variants. |
21 |
|
22 |
I like to code. It's debugging the stuff that drives me crazy(er?)..... |
23 |
These kids have no respect for us old farts. I remember when |
24 |
"numerical recipies in C" [2] was the stuff. Now it's C++ or Java. [3] |
25 |
I have a book on my shelf (where it belongs) on "Concurrency State |
26 |
Moels & Java" by Magee and Kramer, 1999 - Wiley. What a hoot! |
27 |
|
28 |
I'm still looking for "Numerical recipies in Bash" ? |
29 |
Ju gonna code that up? |
30 |
|
31 |
Howz your Fortan 90? I did not even know there was such an |
32 |
ugly beast [4]. I thought Fortran was outlawed decades ago. |
33 |
I guess nothing ever dies. Physicists have to have a language |
34 |
to themselves. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
Anyway, my_python is comming along...... |
38 |
(pist, don't tell anyone, but I almost, (almost) like python). |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
[1] http://maven.apache.org/ |
42 |
[2] http://www.nrbook.com/a/bookcpdf.php |
43 |
[3] http://www.nr.com/ |
44 |
[4] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
hth, |
49 |
James |