| 1 |
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 17:31, Kai Kuehne wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi Rumen, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 3/7/06, Rumen Yotov <rumen@××××××.org> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hi, |
| 6 |
> > Not 100 % sure but think that you can't use 'distcc' with hardened & |
| 7 |
> > vanilla profiles, even if gcc versions are the same. |
| 8 |
> > These profiles have different compile flags, etc. |
| 9 |
> > Some time ago here (ML) there were an error message due to use if |
| 10 |
> > hardened & normal GCC (python segfault IIRC) using "distcc". |
| 11 |
> > HTH.Rumen |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thanks! |
| 14 |
> Does anyone know that architecture is better? |
| 15 |
> Should I use x86 or i686 instead of amd64 to make distcc between my |
| 16 |
> server and my laptop(pentium4 profile) work? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Greetings :) |
| 19 |
> Kai |
| 20 |
Hi, |
| 21 |
Just some directions, as i don't use it (distcc). |
| 22 |
First check the distcc-doc in gentoo.org. |
| 23 |
Then read (/etc/make.conf.example) about setting your CFLAGS. |
| 24 |
IIRC there's at least three "-march=", "-mcpu=" and "-mtune=". |
| 25 |
By memory (for example) -mtune=pentium4 give your generated code which is |
| 26 |
backward compatible with i686. |
| 27 |
But don't just believe me, check first. Someone else here? |
| 28 |
PS: also better use the sama GCC version on both machines. |
| 29 |
HTH.Rumen |
Archives