1 |
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:36:03 -0700 |
3 |
> schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com>: |
4 |
|
5 |
>> The warnings don't bother me that much, I just feel they are Bad |
6 |
>> Policy. Enabling cgroups would add unnecessary complexity to the |
7 |
>> kernel configuration, if only a bit. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> On the other hand, if such warning weren't there, it would make |
10 |
> installing full-featured systems more difficult. And any experienced |
11 |
> Gentoo user can decide on her/his own how to react to such warnings. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I like to have such warnings in. It gives me hints what I like to have |
14 |
> and what not and gives me the opportunity to improve my knowledge by |
15 |
> researching on that warning. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> An improvement could maybe be made: Such warnings could tell links into |
18 |
> the Gentoo wiki for further information on that topic. |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
Yes, positive warnings would make the difference: |
22 |
"Your kernel lacks support for cfoo. You can use this package but |
23 |
feature bar will be disabled. See |
24 |
"https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Bar_great" |
25 |
|
26 |
As opposed to: |
27 |
"Your kernel lacks support for cfoo. You absolutely must enable cfoo, |
28 |
everybody knows that, what were you thinking?! Do the right thing or |
29 |
else..." |
30 |
|
31 |
Regards |
32 |
|
33 |
Jorge |