Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Missing keyword. Overlay question too, maybe. | ||
| Date: | Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:34:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 64572bf593980616c13735ec207278f70f0ba776.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Missing keyword. Overlay question too, maybe. by Dale |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 10:20 -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Thanks to both for the info. Looks to me like they would test these |
| 4 | > packages in a local overlay first then move when major arches are |
| 5 | > ready. To each his/her own. I was hoping to use the more recent |
| 6 | > version and not have to update for a while. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | That works well for smaller packages the maintainer can test himself, |
| 10 | but when you need to ask *other* people to test for you, you get better |
| 11 | results the easier that is. |