Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Chris Lieb <chris.lieb@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerge question: What's with the @?
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:45:15
Message-Id: gkiqh9$k2i$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge question: What's with the @? by Nick Cunningham
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Nick Cunningham wrote:
5 >
6 >
7 > 2009/1/13 Chris Lieb <chris.lieb@×××××.com <mailto:chris.lieb@×××××.com>>
8 >
9 > I've noticed lately on the ML that people have been talking about using
10 > package sets, such as @world and @installed. I figured it was a part of
11 > portage 2.1.6* since using @world with 2.1.4* would result in an error
12 > message about an invalid package atom. However, after upgrading to
13 > portage 2.1.6.4, I still get the same error when doing something like
14 > 'emerge -up @world'.
15 >
16 > What are these package sets? What is the difference between 'emerge -up
17 > world' and 'emerge -up @world'? Why don't these package sets ever work
18 > for me?
19 >
20 > Thanks,
21 > Chris
22 >
23 >
24 > A set is basically just group of packages, you can either define you own
25 > using /etc/portage/ or using gentoo provided ones like @world and
26 > @system (which will replace the current emerge system/world usage
27 > eventually), aswell as useful sets such as @live-rebuild (any package
28 > that uses a cvs/svn/git eclass, so basically any -9999 ebuild) and
29 > @module-rebuild which is handy for rebuilding kernel modules. Also id
30 > imagine meta-packages will eventually move over to sets as it makes
31 > rebuilding everything or removing it much easier, currently theres only
32 > kde4 that makes large usage of sets but id imagine once portage 2.20
33 > goes stable we'l see great set adoption.
34 > An easy way to see what sets are available is to use the emerge
35 > --list-sets command.
36 >
37 > -Nick
38
39 Thanks for the info. The @module-rebuild should come in handy. Any
40 idea on when we'll see 2.2* hit stable?
41
42 Thanks again,
43 Chris
44
45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
47 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
48
49 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJJbO1pAAoJEJWxx7fgsD+CClQH/iJudCvbWQmx5IT/CbGL7Rl2
50 N5TbYtTWhwGgd4xrhPJvlT3MvU4I207+W40lqmtnftaLQaPu+L4nzDervqsh3dlW
51 GPnq1u8v0ASksip/4ZIeC1jMPMTmjcCFagXPiZoouxvZd9YI83xxkLReZbmcniap
52 8BFGgFVn4M3iGWpma4h+ceYOECGjOxdQTDI5kcH31PHVBVzinYgWj6gm9SbRLEhf
53 7H0rS00eDSPndeE6192MBR4BY+gx+FbkmlwxTc7UzGVnCyAZCGN3YC+Sr2s0JwGX
54 VGtNV+mAcuk3byS6V2d0hxvzcMuHn3o6VrgspvDF6wda5wnwjjAjkW023baS3RU=
55 =QWDy
56 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerge question: What's with the @? Nick Cunningham <nick@××××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerge question: What's with the @? Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>