Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: anti-portage wreckage?
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:10:34
Message-Id: 200701021202.59258.alan@linuxholdings.co.za
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: anti-portage wreckage? by Daniel Barkalow
1 On Tuesday 02 January 2007 08:50, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
2 > I also think that emerge should keep track of the config files
3 > installed by packages, so that etc-update knows if you've got local
4 > modifications, and give you a big warning when you might lose a
5 > change you made.
6
7 Huh? Portage already does this. Standard config dirs are
8 CONFIG_PROTECTed which is where etc-update comes in. It will merge
9 trivial changes (whitespace, etc) and let *you* chose what to do for
10 everything else. You get to keep the original file, use the update, or
11 use a customized merge of the two.
12
13 There is no need to give you a big warning if you might lose a change -
14 the very act of running etc-update at all IS that warning. It's
15 understood that if the new file shows up, then you DO have local
16 modifications
17
18 alan
19 --
20 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: anti-portage wreckage? Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@××××××××.org>