1 |
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 13:57 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 21:33 +0900, Steve B wrote: |
3 |
> > WTF.. I'm getting ready to rebuild my gentoo box. I have always did a |
4 |
> > stage 1 install. i was under the impression that if u used a stage 3 |
5 |
> > u couldn't muck with your CFLAGS or what not. |
6 |
|
7 |
The only flag you should not change after a stage 3 install is CHOST. If |
8 |
you downloaded the right stage3 tarball there is no reason to do so |
9 |
unless you are cross-compiling. Note that stage1 is still available, but |
10 |
no longer supported by the handbook, as there is allmost no reason, even |
11 |
for an experienced gentoo-er not to use stage3. |
12 |
|
13 |
> If I'm forced to use |
14 |
> > canned binaries I might as well go with FC or Debian.. I've never |
15 |
> > listened to the "Gentoo is dead" comments.. but now who knows.. this |
16 |
> > is just crazy.. who came up with this stupid idea? from the sounds of |
17 |
> > it certianly not the Gentoo Community! |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I think you haven't really read the discussions about this topic. As |
21 |
> long as you don't edit bootstrap.sh, |
22 |
> |
23 |
> stage3->emerge sync->adapt make.conf, package.* files etc.->emerge -e |
24 |
> world |
25 |
> |
26 |
> will just have the same effect as a stage1 install but |
27 |
> |
28 |
> - faster |
29 |
> - with fewer pitfalls |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Regards, |
32 |
> Matthias |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |